## Monday, 11 September 2017

### An objective prior probability for guilt?

One of the greatest impediments to the use of probabilistic reasoning in legal arguments is the difficulty in agreeing on an appropriate prior probability that the defendant is guilty. The 'innocent until proven guilty' assumption technically means a prior probability of 0 - a figure that (by Bayesian reasoning) can never be overturned no matter how much evidence follows. Some have suggested the logical equivalent of 1/N where N is the number of people in the world. But this probability is clearly too low as N includes too many who could not physically have committed the crime. On the other hand the often suggested prior 0.5 is too high as it stacks the odds too much against the defendant.

Therefore, even strong supporters of a Bayesian approach seem to think they can and must ignore the need to consider a  prior probability of guilt (indeed it is this thinking that explains the prominence of the 'likelihood ratio' approach discussed so often on this blog).

New work - presented at the 2017 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Law (ICAIL 2017) - shows that, in a large class of cases, it is possible to arrive at a realistic prior that is also as consistent as possible with the legal notion of ‘innocent until proven guilty’. The approach is based first on identifying the 'smallest' time and location from the actual crime scene within which the defendant was definitely present and then estimating the number of people - other than the suspect - who were also within this time/area. If there were n people in total, then before any other evidence is considered each person, including the suspect, has an equal prior probability 1/n of having carried out the crime.

The method applies to cases where we assume a crime has definitely taken place and that it was committed by one person against one other person (e.g. murder, assault, robbery). The work considers both the practical and legal implications of the approach and demonstrates how the prior probability is naturally incorporated into a generic Bayesian network model that allows us to integrate other evidence about the case.

Full details:
Fenton, N. E., Lagnado, D. A., Dahlman, C., & Neil, M. (2017). "The Opportunity Prior: A Simple and Practical Solution to the Prior Probability Problem for Legal Cases". In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Law (ICAIL 2017). Published by ACM. Pre-publication draft.

1. Am writing this great article to appreciate the good work of Doctor Omoluyi. I have been married for 2 years with pain and agony because my husband left me for another lady. I was reviewing some post on the internet on how i could get back my husband then, i saw a post by Lori Dante from Germany who testified of Doctor Omoluyi the almighty spiritual caster. I contacted Lori Dante to confirm about Doctor Omoluyi and she guaranteed me and gave me the courage to contact Doctor Omoluyi for help. So, i contacted him and he assured me that my days of sorrows are over that i will get back my husband within 12 to 16 hours. I did all what he told me and am very happy today that my husband is back to me and we are now living happily like never before and i can boldly and proudly testify to the world that Doctor Omoluyi is a good and remarkable helper that specializes on different kind of spells. If you need his help, then contact him on E-mail: ( doctoromoluyispelltemple@gmail.com ) OR Text +1 (914)-517-3229 for more info.

2. Its very imppressive article for us thankkk you.
Safety and risk management is a vital part of any Australian business. However doing it right and in line with the new Australian WHS legislation is a complex task where many variables need to be considered.